Comparison of fuzzy MCDM approaches in the elevator selection problem

Main Article Content

Goran Marković
Francu Catalin
Vanyo Ralev
Nebojša Zdravković
Marko Todorović
Predrag Mladenović


Considering a part of the problem in the domain of vertical transport, and above all elevators, it is noticeable that there are a large number of technically feasible alternatives in most cases. The designer's task is to choose from a set of possible solutions that best match the technical and economic conditions defined by the project task. The design and appropriate MCDM technique determine the quality of the recommended decision, saving computational time without sacrificing quality in the final ranking of alternatives. The task is to choose solutions that best match the technical and economic conditions. Therefore, selecting an adequate elevator is a problem that requires the manipulation of a large number of different data and, at the same time, the inclusion of a significant number of relevant criteria and goals that can often conflict. Fuzzy logic has proven excellent in models where intuition and judgment are primary elements. This paper aims to present a systematic overview of the developed fuzzy MCDM techniques. By ranking and comparative analysis of the results, this research represents an attempt to choose a method to support decision-making and create a comprehensive tool in the elevator selection process

Article Details

How to Cite
G. Marković, F. Catalin, V. Ralev, N. Zdravković, M. Todorović, and P. Mladenović, “Comparison of fuzzy MCDM approaches in the elevator selection problem ”, ET, vol. 3, no. 2, Jul. 2024.
Original Scientific Papers


S. Chakraborty and D. Banik, “Design of material handling equipment selection model using analytic hierarchy process“, Intelligent Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Vol. 28, pp. 1237-1245,, (2006)

F. Zahedi, “The analytic hierarchy process: A survey of the method and its applications“, Interfaces, Vol. 16(4), pp. 96-108, (2006)

P.R. Drake and D.M. Lee, “Component prioritisation for strategic purchasing and the case study of a South Korean elevator manufacturer”, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, Vol. 43, pp. 883–895,, (2009)

M. Almobarek, S. Mejjaouli, A. Bouras, and A. Alrashdan, “A AHP-based decision support system for elevators selection”, 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Singapore (Singapore), pp. 3156-3163,, (2021)

S. R. Sahamir, R. Zakaria, R. R. Raja Muhammad Rooshdi, M. A. Adenan, S. M. Shamsuddin, N. I. Abidin, N. A. Adillah Ismail, and E. Aminudin, “Multi-criteria decision analysis for evaluating sustainable lifts design of public hospital buildings“, Chemical Engineering Transactions, Vol. 63, pp. 199-204,, (2018)

A. Özcan, U. O. Karaköprü, and E. Yap, “Choosing intelligent elevator control system by using Analytic Hierarchy Process in high-rise buildings”, International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Review, Vol. 5(8), pp. 40 – 53, (2017)

E. Marchesi, A. Hamdy, and R. Kunz, “Information and Transportation: Sensor Systems in Modern High-Rise Elevators “. In Sensors Applications, eds J. Hesse, J.W. Gardner and W. Göpel,, (2005)

K. Hirasawa, S. Kuzunuki, T. Iwasaka, T. Kaneko, and K. Kawatake, “Hall call assignment in elevator supervisory control“, The transactions of the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan.C, Vol. 99(2), pp. 27-32,, (1979)

J. Koehler and D. Ottiger. “An AI-based approach to destination control in elevators”. AI Magazine, Vol. 23(3), pp. 59-78,, (2002),

T. Tervonen, H. Hakonen, and R. Lahdelma, “Elevator planning with stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis“, Omega, Vol. 36(3), pp. 352-362,, (2008)

W. Pan, Y. Xiang, W. Gong, and H. Shen, "Risk evaluation of elevators based on fuzzy theory and machine learning algorithms" Mathematics, Vol. 12(1), p. 113,, (2024)

D. Niu, L. Guo, W. Zhao, and H. Li, “Operation performance evaluation of elevators based on condition monitoring and combination weighting method“, Measurement , Vol. 194, p. 111091,, (2022)

O. Kulak, “A decision support system for fuzzy multi-attribute selection of material handling equipments”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 29(2), pp.310-319,, (2005)

G. Tuzkaya, B. Gulsun, C. Kahraman, and D. Ozgen, “An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methodology for material handling equipment selection problem and an application“, Expert Systems witjh Applications. Vol. 37(4), pp. 2853-2863,, (2010)

T-Y. Wang, C-F. Shaw, and Y-L. Chen, “Machine selection in flexible manufacturing cell: A fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making approach“, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 38(5), pp. 2079-2097,, (2000)

Z. Ayağ and R. G. Özdemir, “A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tools alternatives“, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 17, pp. 179-190,, (2006)

R. Rai, S. Kameshwaran, and M. K. Tiwari, “Machine tool selection and operation allocation in FMS: Solving a fuzzy goal programming model using a genetic algorithm“, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 40(3), pp. 641-645,, (2002)

M. Yurdakul and Y. T. İç, “Analysis of the benefit generated by using fuzzy numbers in a TOPSIS model developed for machine tool selection problems“, Journal of Material Processing Technology, Vol. 209(1), pp. 310-317,, (2009)

İ. Kaya, M. Çolak, and F. Terzi, “A comprehensive review of fuzzy multi criteria decision making methodologies for energy policy making”, Energy Strategy Reviews, Volume 24, pp. 207-228,, (2019)

L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets”, Information and Control, Vol. 8(3), pp. 338–353,, (1965)

G. Marković, “Model of regional logistics with transport systems”, PhD thesis, University of Kragujevac (Serbia), (2014)

M. Dağdeviren, “Decision Making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE“, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 19, pp. 397-406,, (2008)

C-L. Hwang and K. Yoon, “Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. A state-of-the-art survey“, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (Germany), (1981)

C-T. Chen, “Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment “, Fuzzy sets and systems, Vol. 114(1), pp. 1–9,, (2000)

S. Opricović, “Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems “, PhD thesis, University of Belgrade (Serbia), (1998)

S. Opricović, “A fuzzy compromise solution for multicriteria problems“. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 15(3), pp. 363–380,, (2007)

W. Salabun and K. Urbaniak. “A new coefficient of rankings similarity in decision-making problems”, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference “Computational Science – ICCS 2020”, Amsterdam (The Nederlands), pp. 632 – 645, (2020)

B. Kizielewicz and A. Bączkiewicz, “Comparison of Fuzzy TOPSIS, Fuzzy VIKOR, Fuzzy WASPAS and Fuzzy MMOORA methods in the housing selection problem”, Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 192, pp. 4578-4591,, (2021)