Performance analysis of sensors in a mechatronic system for transformer magnetic core lamination cutting within an automated production line
Main Article Content
Abstract
Transformer magnetic core lamination cutting is a critical process in transformer manufacturing, directly affecting product quality and production efficiency. This paper presents an analysis of the sensor systems employed on an automated cutting line for silicon-steel transformer magnetic core laminations. The study identifies the types and roles of sensors used across the line’s key subsystems (uncoiler, feeder, cutting station, and stacker) and evaluates their performance relative to industrial requirements. The findings indicate that conventional inductive, optical (e.g., photoelectric), and magnetic sensors, together with rotary encoders, provide the necessary feedback for automation, cutting precision (±0.1 mm), and control. However, they offer limited self-diagnostic capabilities, increasing downtime during troubleshooting. To enhance reliability and enable predictive maintenance, the integration of advanced “smart” sensors with real-time communication (e.g., EtherCAT, IO-Link) is recommended. The results demonstrate how sensor selection and placement influence cutting accuracy and system downtime and suggest improvements such as leveraging servo-drive feedback and IoT-based monitoring to optimize sensor usage. Practical insights are provided for improving automated production lines in accordance with modern industrial and Industry 4.0 trends, aiming to increase operational efficiency, reduce maintenance costs, and ensure high product quality.
Article Details
References
[1] D. M. Scott, “Industrial Process Sensors”, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida (USA), (2008)
[2] H. K. Tönshoff and I. Inasaki, “Sensors in Manufacturing”, Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim (Germany), (2001)
[3] M. Javaid, A. Haleem, R. P. Singh, S. Rab, and R. Suman, “Significance of sensors for Industry 4.0: Roles, capabilities, and applications”, Sensors International, Vol. 2, p. 100110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100110, (2021)
[4] M. Achouch, M. Dimitrova, K. Ziane, K., S. S. Karganroudi, R. Dhouib, H. Ibrahim, and M. Adda, “On predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0: Overview, models, and challenges”, Applied Sciences, Vol. 12(16), p. 8081, https://doi.org/10.3390/app1216808, (2022)
[5] M. Pech, J. Vrchota, and J. Bednář, “Predictive maintenance and intelligent sensors in smart factory”, Sensors, Vol. 21(4), p. 1470, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041470, (2021)
[6] A. Momin, “Review of electrical steels with their properties and recent trends for improvement”, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 17(41), pp. 4270–4286, https://doi.org/10.17485/IJST/v17i41.1502, (2024)
[7] HEIDENHAIN, “ERN 480 Incremental Rotary Encoder”, https://www.heidenhain.com/products/rotary-encoders, [Accessed: Jul. 17, 2025]
[8] Pepperl+Fuchs, “NBB5-18GM50-E2-V1 Inductive Sensor”, https://www.pepperl-fuchs.com/en/products-gp25581?class=30650, [Accessed: Jul. 17, 2025]
[9] Pepperl+Fuchs, “ML6-8-H-40-RT/59/115/136 Photoelectric Sensor”, https://www.pepperl-fuchs.com/en/products-gp25581?class=30652, [Accessed: Jul. 17, 2025]
[10] FESTO, “Cylinder Position Sensors”, https://www.festo.com/rs/sr/c/proizvodi/senzori/senzor-polozaja-id_pim128/, [Accessed: Jul. 17, 2025]
[11] G. Jombo, Y. E. Zhang, and N. Lu, “Sensor fault detection and diagnosis: Methods and challenges”, Proceedings of the 12th ISymposium on Fault Detection, Supervision and Safety for Technical Processes (IFAC SAFEPROCESS 2024), Ferrara (Italy), 4-6 June 2024, (2024)
[12] Sick AG, “Industrial Sensors Overview”, https://www.sick.com/cz/en/catalog/catalog/products/detection-sensors/c/g568257, [Accessed: Jul. 17, 2025]
[13] J. Lee, B. Bagheri, and H.-A. Kao, “A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems”, Manufacturing Letters, Vol. 3, pp. 18–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001, (2015)
[14] H. J. Gonzaga and T. C. Pimenta, “Study and application of the IO-Link industrial network in the context of Industry 4.0”, Proceedings of the 2023 30th International Conference on Mixed Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems (MIXDES), Kraków (Poland), 29-30 June 2023, pp. 1–6, https://doi.org/10.23919/MIXDES58562.2023.10203244, (2023)
[15] L. Wang, M. Törngren, and M. Onori, “Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing”, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 37(Part 2), pp. 517–527, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.04.008, (2015)
[16] https://www.beckhoff.com/en-us/
[17] https://meswarm.com/
[18] A. Arsić, M. Luković, and N. Dučić, “MESWARM: A modular and ai-driven manufacturing execution system for Industry 4.0”, Proceedings of the X International scientific conference “HIGH TECHNOLOGIES. BUSINESS. SOCIETY 2025”, Borovets (Bulgaria), 17-20 March 2025, pp. 23–28, (2025)